Introduction  The brief for this task was to design a concept surrounding the idea of birdhouses in groups, thinking outside of the box, and testing our compatibilities working as a creative team.   Group Reflection  Primarily, I formed a group of three with Abbie and Sydney, and we began to brain shower initial thoughts and ideas surrounding the birdhouse concept. Upon reflection, I believe we struggled initially to discuss ideas and get them down on the page. However, this was due to being distracted and off-topic. We were prompt to recognise this flaw within our team and decided to evaluate whether we needed a creative director to ensure we stayed focused on the task. We decided against having a creative director because none of us felt confident enough to lead the team. We agreed as a team to ensure we only conversed on the birdhouse task and stayed focused entirely on the concepts at hand. Overall, after facing our initial struggle I felt we had valuable ideas surrounding the brief. If we stayed focused on the brief from the beginning, we could have applied more depth to our starting points and linked our designs to one another. In the future, I will be proactive in ensuring my group is focused and that everyone feels they can speak up about their ideas, diminishing any discomfort the group may feel. Individual Design Process Once my group finished the brain-showering portion of this project we decided to choose one concept each and design a campaign surrounding the idea.  I initially thought of the word ‘bird’ as English slang for women which led me to design Birds of Advice. Originally, I decided to focus on the idea of the ‘birdhouse’ becoming a safe space for women to take refuge from domestic abuse. Although after contemplating the concept becoming too heavy, I decided to focus the narrative on an overall sexual health clinic solely for women. After developing the concept for Birds of Advice, I started to think of ways to communicate the message through a series of visual leaflets. I decided to incorporate discreet light-hearted messages in the leaflet designs by adding comical sayings which could be associated with sexual health and actual birds in keeping with the overall theme.   The Concept – Birds of Advice, a sexual health clinic for women.  Target Audience – Women of all ages.  Promotion – Leaflet design.  Conclusion  In conclusion, I feel my team worked well together to generate ideas but could have made an extra effort to stay focused throughout the brain-showering process. In addition, I believe our time management let us down when designing our chosen concepts, which led to most of the work needing to be completed outside of the university. This made it hard to interact and be readily available to give each other feedback. 

Introduction  The brief for the group activity was to design a campaign in two hours that aims to persuade preschool children between the ages of 3 – 5 to drink water over sugary drinks. Group Reflection  Initially, we composed our group of four and discussed who should take the lead position of creative director; we concluded that Ellie and I would take joint responsibility for leading the team and ensuring everybody’s voice was heard. Next, we evaluated the concept and brainstormed as many ideas as possible to ensure we had a broad range of topics to explore that contributed towards the campaigning brief. The group was proactive throughout brainstorming, reinforcing our previous personality tests’ results and suggesting that we are all team workers, helping us function well without anyone feeling left out of the conversation. After the brainstorming portion of the activity was over, we decided as a group to delegate the most fitting task to each teammate, ensuring that the work was evenly spread, considering everyone’s strengths and weaknesses. I was given the task of designing a board game.  We then decided on a target audience and brand identity, considering colours and typography to ensure the branding of all our designs was consistent throughout. We struggled when deciding on a name for our concept but ended up deciding on ‘Aquakids’. The name clearly communicates the branding, persuading preschool children to drink more water. Upon reflection, I feel the group worked well together without any significant setbacks; we all had an equal voice and communicated well, ensuring there were no inconsistencies throughout the time working together. Logo Design Figures 3 to 9 show the evolution of how the Aquakids logo developed over time; as a team, we discussed the different logos designed by Ellie and me. We concluded by combining elements from both designs to create a well-rounded logo which clearly represents the brand identity. Individual Design Process  My contribution to the campaign brief was to design a board game children could play to make drinking water more fun. I used illustrator to communicate the design, ensuring the branding was consistent with the group’s choices. Throughout the design process, I asked for feedback from the group to ensure we were all on the same page about the design and so I could get constructive feedback following design choices. Figures 10 to 19 are images of the board game ‘Save the Polar Bears by Aquakids’.  The thought process behind the Save the Polar Bears board game was to inspire children to drink more water while briefly educating them on the climate crisis; this brings more educational depth to the game and links well with the water theme.The rules of the game are simple; the children spin the wheel, and depending on which direction the spinner lands on, they either ‘freeze’ the ice by drinking water and connecting a magnet to the game board or they melt the ice by removing a magnet from the game board and spinning again. The game will continue until all the ice is ‘frozen’, and the polar bears are saved. Upon completion of the board game, the children will be awarded a sticker for drinking their water. Moreover, this encourages them to earn stickers for their charts, gaining them prizes once they have completed their charts for the week.  Rejected Design  The snakes and ladders inspired board game ended up becoming a rejected design through a group re-evaluation after hearing feedback from the class. The original game idea was scrapped due to it not communicating the whole purpose of the campaign efficiently and potentially being too tricky for younger children to understand. However, as discussed above, the concept led to new ideas of including an educational factor in the new board game design.